VASEP opposes anti-dumping tax

Friday, Sep 06, 2013 07:31

A tra fillet proccessing line at Song Tien Fishery Factory in Dong Thap Province. — VNA/VNS Photo Dinh Hue

HCM CITY (Biz Hub)— The Viet Nam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers (VASEP) has voiced its objection to the anti-dumping tax rates on imported Vietnamese tra fish imposed by the preliminary decision of the US Department of Commerce (DOC) after the ninth administrative review (POR9).

In its press release yesterday, the association asked DOC to keep Bangladesh as the proxy country for calculating the input costs of Vietnamese tra fish products in the final decision of the POR8 and 9 as in previous years.

Under DOC's preliminary decision announced on Wednesday, Vietnamese frozen tra fish filets exported to the US between August 1, 2011 and July 31, 2012 will be subjected to anti-dumping taxes.

Accordingly, the anti-dumping duties on products of two mandatory reviewed companies will be US$0.42 /kg and $2.15/kg respectively and for other voluntary companies it will be $0.99/kg.

VASEP said it was unhappy with DOC's sudden decision to use a different surrogate country to calculate the cost of Vietnamese fish products in the POR9.

Earlier, VASEP and tra fish exporters to the US filed a petition to the US Court of International Trade (US CIT) over the final decision of DOC's POR8, asking the court to consider the accuracy of DOC's calculation and force it to re-select a more suitable benchmark country and re-calculate the anti-dumping taxes.

The CIT accepted the petition and asked US Customs to temporarily stop collecting anti-dumping taxes from Vietnamese exporters under the POR8 decision until the court makes its final decision.

According to VASEP, the decision to choose Indonesia as the reference country has led to irrationally high anti-dumping tax rates as approved in the preliminary decision of the POR9.

In previous PORs, it was DOC that always objected to Indonesia as the third country as it has insufficient price data and basic financial parameters.

Indonesia, in fact, is an importer of Vietnamese frozen tra filets, not a tra fish exporter.

The decision also goes against the one made by DOC on November 8, 2012 when it announced the list of six countries to be used as proxies for the POR9, which excluded Indonesia, as the country was not "economically comparable" to Viet Nam based on more than half of POR's criteria, according to the association.

VASEP further said that DOC consecutively chose Bangladesh as the benchmark country for valuing the input of Vietnamese tra fish in the previous PORs.

Bangladesh also produces commercial "hypophthalmus" tra fish and breeds them in ponds like Viet Nam, and production costs and revenue from tra fish in Viet Nam and Bangladesh are nearly the same.

As a result, there is no reason for Indonesia to become the proxy country, nor its data more reliable to be the basis for the preliminary decision of the POR9 as well as the final decision of POR8, according to VASEP. — VNS

Comments (1)

Tôi thiết nghĩ nạn tàn phá gỗ rừng mình gọi là "lâm tặc" thì đúng rồi. Còn nạn cướp cát thì phải gọi là "sa tặc" thì đúng hơn, vì "sa" cũng có nghĩa lá "cát" đồng nghĩa với từ "thổ" cũng có nghĩa lá cát, nhưng chữ "thổ" lại hàm ý rộng hơn về việc đất có chủ quyền, còn "sa" thì bản thân hiểu hơn giản chỉ lá cát. Vì vậy, nếu dùng "cát tặc" thì nghe nó hơi bị kỳ. Thứ nhất là về ngữ âm nó hơi khập khiễng, gọi là "giặc cát" cho đúng, còn không thì gọi luôn cụm từ "sa tặc" cho dễ hiểu và thuần về âm Hán Việt.

Thanh Hải - Wednesday, 17/06/2015, 09:17 Reply | Like
Statistic