 |
| US will continue imposing anti-dumping duty on Vietnamese frozen warm water shrimp to the US market after the second five-year sunset review, reported the Viet Nam Competition Authority (VCA).— Photo thoibao.today |
HA NOI (Biz Hub) — US will continue imposing anti-dumping duty on Vietnamese frozen warm water shrimp to the US market after the second five-year sunset review, reported the Viet Nam Competition Authority (VCA).
According to the preliminary results of the second five-year sunset review of the antidumping duty order (AD Order) released on September 9, the Department of Commerce (DOC) on March 1, 2016 initiated the second sunset review of certain frozen warm water shrimp from Viet Nam.
The department found that revoking the AD Order would be likely to lead to recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the "Preliminary Results of Review" section of the notice.
Viet Nam's respondents said that they continue to ship at levels comparable to levels before the AD Order was imposed, according to the review.
The respondents each would have received de minimis margins in every review since the last sunset review if zeroing of negative dumping margins had not been applied, before or after the department adopted its differential pricing methodology.
Respondents expected the actual, non-zeroed margins to remain de minimis upon revocation, because the companies were able to sell at high volumes without dumping while the order was in place.
Meanwhile, the department examined the International Trade Commission (ITC) Dataweb data on the record of imports of the merchandise for the period before and after the AD Order was issued.
The showed that while import volumes fluctuated following the AD Order, they have more recently remained at the same or higher volumes than pre-order import volumes.
Given the continued existence of margins calculated without zeroing in the eighth and ninth administrative reviews, completed since the 2011 Continuation Order, it is unlikely that respondents would be able to sell at pre-order volumes without dumping.
In addition, respondents argued that the margin likely to prevail was de minimis because the respondents would have received de minimis margins in every review conducted since the last sunset review if the department had not used zeroing in its calculations.
The department said with the exception of the last three most-recently completed administrative reviews, the department used average-to-average comparisons, along with zeroing, for each segment under the AD Order.
However, the Viet Nam-wide rate, which has remained unchanged since the underlying investigation, was based on adverse facts available, the department said.
This adverse facts available rate was based on the petition and, therefore, did not include zeroing and is consistent with the Final Modification for Reviews. Thus, the DOC found that it has appropriated to provide the lTC the margin of 25.76 per cent from the original investigation, which was based on adverse facts available, and not on the use of average-to-average comparisons with zeroing, as the rate up to which dumping is likely to continue or recur.
The final results of the second five-year sunset review are scheduled to be issued in January 2017.
EC re-imposes AD duty on shoes.
The European Commission (EC) re-imposed anti-dumping duties on imported leather shoes from Viet Nam in the period from 07/10/2006 to 31/3/2011, according to the regulation (EU) 2016/1647 released on September 13, 2016 per the Official Journal of the European Union.
A definitive anti-dumping duty would be re-imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Viet Nam and produced by Best Royal Co Ltd, Lac Cuong Footwear Co Ltd, Lac Ty Co Ltd, Sao Viet Joint Stock Company (Megastar Joint Stock Company), VMC Royal Co Ltd, Freetrend Industrial Ltd and its related company Freetrend Industrial A (Viet Nam) Co Ltd, Fulgent Sun Footwear Co Ltd, General Shoes Ltd, Golden Star Co Ltd, Golden Top Company Co Ltd, Kingmaker Footwear Co Ltd, Tripos Enterprise Inc Viet Nam Shoe Majesty Co Ltd.
Viet Nam's Ministry of Industry and Trade said in 2005, the EC announced anti-dumping investigations against leather shoes from Viet Nam and China.
In 2006, the EC issued a decision on imposing anti-dumping duty at 16.5 per cent for China and 10 per cent for Viet Nam. The anti-dumping measures were terminated for Viet Nam and a number of Chinese companies since 2011. — VNS